|
The simple reality is, that the whole system is gone. It cannot be resurrected. Only the nations that are being strangled to death by debt all over the world, can still be saved, provided we are daring enough to call a spate a spate, and accept that the bankrupt system is bankrupt.
It takes a great man, someone like Theoden, to be that daring, to stand up and declare that the gleaming citadel that has become a debt-ridden shell, is not an asset anymore to anyone, but should be reevaluated in an honest bankruptcy reorganization while there is still something left standing that keeps the population alive, precariously as it is. That's where LaRouche stands alone, and has stood his ground for a long time already. No one else had dared to stand with him. President Clinton had once dared to stick his head out of the trenches, merely suggesting that there is something wrong. He was promptly hit with a scandal that disabled his Presidency. Sanity and truth are not allowed in the world of economics; not yet.
So, how does Saruman respond in the saga to being threated by Theoden, and to have his claims utterly rejected?
He simply laughs at the notion that the power of synarchism could ever be regarded as less than absolute, so that it could be broken. "Gibbets and crows!" he jests. With a snake hiss he now slanders Theodem in the worst possible manner. He suggests that the noose that he spoke of would be around his own neck, tightening, slowly and hard in the end. He finally scoffs at his own patience that he said he had wasted on him. With this he simply drops Theoden in a torrent of verbal abuse and then turns on Gandalf.
Indeed, we have seen a lot of verbal abuse already, especially of whoever challenges the synarchists. LaRouche has long been a prime target. He was treated like scum in the 1980s, from the moment on that he challenged the synarchist doctrine of "Mutually Assured Destruction" as a doctrine for defense. He proposed a world of sovereign nations, all linked laterally, to build a common defense which would also develop the scientific and technological potential of every nation, which would also develop their economies.
LaRouche was slandered and persecuted for this suggestion in the worst way. Finally he was given an ultimatum to either fall in line with the synarchists' goal, or go to jail. He chose jail rather than to betray the truth. He was consequently incarcerated for five years on a drummed up conviction that the former Attorney General Ramsey Clark said "involves a broader range of deliberate and systematic misconduct and abuse of power over a longer period of time in an effort to destroy a political movement and leader, than any other federal prosecution in my time or to my knowledge." That's the kind of world he was demanded to all in like with. He stood his ground.
LaRouche was released in 1994. He is still being slandered intensely. Often, when his name is mentioned in the press, his jailing is immediately attached to his name, while never a words is being said about his commitment not to betray the truth which must remain long standing as a beacon of hope to save civilization. The bottom line is, that the truth is still banned universally in today's age. LaRouche still stands largely alone in a world ruled by synarchism.
Tolkien understood half a century ago that such a thing could and might happen. In the saga, when Saruman is finished with Theodem, he turns to Gandalf.
He addresses Gandalf in a most serious tone, saying that he truly grieves for him as he feels his shame for having fallen so low as to align himself with such unworthy company as he now keeps. With that said, Saruman offers a way out, a gracious chance that he may confer with him at a level worthy of his stature, if he would only listen to his counsel.
Gandalf replies by simply asking him if he had anything to say that he hadn't already said to him when they talked last as he was his prisoner, or if he had anything to retract.
Next Page
|| - page index -
|| - chapter index -
|| - Exit -
||
|
