|
In response to LaRouche's daring fight certain documents and hints were leaked from within the British Empire which had helped LaRouche's cleanup campaign against the House of Windsor. As of this writing, the campaign is still ongoing.
The real campaign, however, needs to be fought on a much deeper level, the level where the full clarity can be gained on a scientific basis, of the true identity of man in the image of God, or reflection of God. It is in this area where the proverbial "shit" has been accumulating the most and where a cleanup is long overdue. Everything else appears to be secondary. Nothing will move on the world-political scene, and the world-financial scene, until a significant movement occurs at this level.
Mary Baker Eddy evidently understood the great challenges this would pose, especially the challenge to correctly perceive the definition for the term "son" which is fundamental to the needed understanding. Had she not introduced the definition "Son of a Year" (as an explanation), but presented only the two contrasting terms, one might not have considered the dynamics that come into play, and the needed actions to clean up the associated "shit."
The Hebrew perception in which a month is called "son of a year," when related to man, comes close to representing the reality of being in which man is a part of the 'domain' of infinite Spirit, Mind, Truth, Love, etc., that is summarily called God. Here is where all of mankind find's its permanent and 'fixed address,' as was pointed out earlier. This apparent play on words points to an important concept that Mary Baker Eddy had strongly highlighted in metaphor in the most unusual and profound manner. In the Appendix to the Church Manual she presents two application forms for membership in the Mother Church, which she has labeled Form I and Form II. In the mid 1980s a friend began to take note of the fact that Mary Baker Eddy had actually presented two different versions of what she called "Form I." One of these begins on page 114 and the other on page 116. Form II begins on page 118. Now, preceding these forms one finds a set of instructions to the applicant which state repeatedly that, depending on the individual's circumstances the forms on pages 114 and 118 are to be used, but no provisions are made for the use of the form on page 116. It appears as if this type of application should never be used.
Against this background the author's friend had examined the differences between the two versions of Application Form I which are virtually identical except for two minute details. One of the differences is found in the name and address that has been filled in as an example. In the form that is not to be used "Mrs. Jennie W. Field" is identified as living on "Forest St." but with no specific address given. In the form that is specified to be used "Mrs. Jennie W. Field" is identified as living at "18 Forest St." (This minute difference appears to be a typographic mistake, but it clearly is not a mistake, because the Name and address is printed twice on each the forms in the same manner. - Please note that in the modern editions of the Church Manual this significant difference has been removed.)
The second difference on the form that is not to be used, is obvious. A provision has been incorporated by which the words "Church of Christ Scientist" can be crossed out. These two differences are clearly related to each other, and they are evidently totally related to the definition of "Son of a Year."
If Mary Baker Eddy's definition of the term "son" is understood as a triple definition, with a state in-between the false identity of man as an offspring of the flesh, and the true identity of man as the son of God, then humanity has no 'fixed address.' This is indeed how humanity has been perceived by its elite, and virtually all the great evils that have been perpetrated in the world in the last century have proceeded from this assumption.
Next Page
|| - page index -
|| - chapter index -
|| - Exit -
||
|
