In real terms, both persecutions reflect the same root cause, namely the attempt to separate truth and justice.  This attempt to separate what is inherently a singularity had become a universal phenomenon.  The recognition of truth and the adminstration of justice are both aspects of divine Principle, and are therefore both aspects of a singular manifest.  If you take away one, you distort the other.

Let's look at Mary Baker Eddy's definition of "burial" for an example.  We ahve a dual definition, here, that presents two distinct concepts with separate sentences.  One of these deals with the burial of corporeal sense, such as many monks had pursued centuries ago.  The other deals with a process of submergence in spirit, and immortality coming to light.  This submergence, too, has been pursued for centuries as people read the Bible and similar books, cover to cover, sometimes repeatedly.  But did either of these processes generate the kind of spirituality that changed the world?  No!  The reason is, that burial is not created by these processes, but is defined by them.  Split away one aspect from the definition, and you loose the whole thing.  By the same token, truth without justice, is meaningless, or justice without truth.  Whenever this singularity is split apart into seperate elements, one finds persecution and injustice, and civilization decays.

The same is true for burial - it manifests itself on a wide front of which Mary Baker Eddy defined but two essential aspects to illustrate the principle.  The same principle can be applied to truth and justice, because, while these are essemtial, they don't present a complete definition of divine Principle without, love, being brought into the context.  Now we need to modify our previous concept, and say, that unless all three are aspects (truth, justice, and love) found in operation together, there is no justice in progress, or truth recognized, but a perversion of them.

The world is filled with such cases where a certain concept can only be correctly perceived by uniting in thought all the essential elements that define it, without which the whole concept is lost.  A good example of this type of perversion, where justice stands without truth and love, is found in the 1998 Starr Chamber Court that has been investigating the President of the United States for years upon years, in what has become the most lengthy, most expensive, and most criminal legal assault ever launched by the U.S. justice department against any president.  The process that is pursued in this case is still called justice, even though there is no longer any regard for truth.  Certainly, there is no love expressed.  The prosecutors and witnesses are richly paid by wealthy oligarchs for the purpose of disabling the functionality of the Presidency during the nation's most critical period in its entire history, as the world-financial system is teetering at the abyss of a global systemic disintegration.  The evident goal of the perversion of justice is to destroy the most effective protective institution that the nation of the USA has created for itself, for precisely such situations.  It is this protection which the enemies of the nation have found a strong hindrance to their goals, which they therefore aim to destroy under the cloak of justice.  Naturally, these processes are not concerned with truth, and even less about love.  Whenever justice becomes a perversion, that is, when it becomes separated from truth and love, it is abused as a destructive instrument.

Without truth and love there is no justice.  These three elements are functionally interdependent and therefore cannot stand in isolation.  If they are seen in isolation their essential nature becomes lost.  This is the kind of complex recognition that Mary Baker Eddy's scientific structure was evidently designed to bring to light.  In fact, Mary Baker Eddy points directly to the dire need for these types of complex recognitions which humanity is so much dependent on.  She highlights the importance of these singular dualities in her definition of the term "Moses," where she writes, that "...without the gospel, - the union of justice and affection, - there is something spiritually lacking."

Next Page

|| - page index - || - chapter index - || - Exit - ||

Stories about  Sex from novels by Rolf A. F. Witzsche