|
Mankind's crown ^versus^ the crown of monarchs.It appears that the rising tide against the monarchy is powered by the same need. As a symbol, the royal crown symbolizes the oligarchic ownership of people under feudalistic rule. It symbolizes slavery and dope networks as exemplified by the Opium wars from which the Chinese nation never really recovered. It symbolizes colonialism, the exploitations of human beings, with blood flowing in all corners of the globe. To a sensitive people this crown does not represent honor and dignity, but stands as a painful symbol. In the scientific sense, the royal crown symbolizes the institution of the monarchy, the principle of oligarchy, the practice of elitism, the power of conservatism. It symbolizes free-trade; genocide - for which it owes a great debt to Ireland and other nations, on account of the genocide of their people, which can never be repaid in full - and it symbolizes war. It is the British royal crown of King Edward VII, the architect of World War One, that symbolizes the destruction nations in games of geopolitical conspiracy to uphold a dying empire. The reason that the royal crown has lost its appeal is more properly to be found in the scientific aspect of the principles of the monarchy, which incorporates the principle of oligarchy, of elitism, of conspiracies and conservatism. These principles are fundamentally in opposition to the principles that support civilization. The royal crown has lost its appeal because of a growing sensitivity among mankind to the operation of counteracting principles. The display of opulent wealth or conspicuous consumption is no longer admired while people are dying in poverty. There is nothing deemed "royal" about the monarchy's concentration of wealth and power that supports antihuman principles and policies. Sensitive people, for instance, find little admiration for attitudes and policies that are centered on shutting humanity down through 'depopulation' measures enforced by poverty, underdevelopment, deindustrialization, and the growing oligarchic control over the world's food and other resources, and the public information media. The royal crown would shine if it represented a spearhead effort for global economic development, for global industrialization and infrastructure creation, for advanced nuclear power research and development, for antiterrorist measures, for anti-dope measures; if it represented a strong base of support for the institution of the sovereign nation-state with protected industries and a sovereign national credit structure, if it supported the development of mankind rather than its destruction. The royal crown shines or becomes dull according to the principles its represents. Royalty itself, is no longer a stepping stone for winning the admiration of society. As the society is becoming more sensitive to what lies behind the shining facade, it becomes aware of these decisive issues. It finds increasingly that its crown is not found in this realm. The above observation is not meant to reflect on individuals, but on the institution of the monarchy and its policy direction that the royal crown represents. The individual member of the monarchy may be charming in their opulent display of wealth. This, by itself, is not the parameter that measures the institutions that the royal crown represents as head of the oligarchic system. It is the principle of oligarchism that tarnishes the crown. More and more the real nature of what it represents is becoming apparent which makes the glitter of the crown vain, its majesty hollow, its symbolism agonizing - such as the blood of World War II that the principle of oligarchy had engineered, and World War I, and the Cold War, and the Vietnam War, etc.. The royal crown symbolizes the institution of oligarchy and elitism, and the resulting principle of elitist dictatorship. These are exemplified by the present U.N. centered policies of Global Governance, and the nuclear terrorist game of the post-war period leading up to the glamorization of Global Governance. Still today, as it was in colonial times, the adopted goal of oligarchic ideology is to establish "a one-world government dictatorship." Its front companies are controlled according to elitist ideologies, like that of the late Bertrand Russell, which ideology found expression in the death of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to create a foundation for the oligarchy's implementation of its coveted U.N.-based global dictatorship, enforced by global terror in a Cold War setting. || - page index - || - chapter index - || - Exit - ||
|
