|
Escalating the destruction of consciousness.
In order to understand the nature of the current ideological bubble, the DDT ban needs to be seen in perspective of the larger game that it is a part of. The first major action against mankind's support structures was the ideological war that was staged against a chemical called PCB, a liquid insulator and conductor of heat that was widely used in the electrical industry. The PCB had been created specifically for its extraordinary chemical stability, nontoxicidy, nonflammability, nonexplosivity, and other ideal characteristics. These PCB based chemicals were the first to be attacked, partly because of their usefulness, but more so to gain a platform for further actions that can be set up in an area of minimal direct impact on the public, resulting from the ban. In order to force the ban through the legislative systems, the PCBs were said to become violent poisons when heated to 300 degrees C. by way of releasing dioxins. For this potential "Hiroshima of Chemistry," as it has been advertised, countless billions of dollars have been spent in replacing all electrical components throughout the world in which PCBs were found, and billions more were spent to destroy the recovered PCBs. Naturally, these costs were paid for by the public, but these costs were paid gladly for the public thought that such actions were necessary to protect the life of people and the integrity of the environment.
Indeed, these vast sums would have been well spent if there had actually been a danger arising from the PCBs. Evidence suggests that the whole danger scenario was a hoax. The question has been asked why it was, that during an explosion at the ICMESA chemical plant in Sevesco, Italy, in June 1976, where the promised chemical catastrophe should have occurred, killing thousands of people, not a single victim could be found? The French scientist Haroun Tazieff, former French secretary of state for the prevention of natural and technological disaster, asked himself that question, as did others. So he did some searching for answers. He was surprised to learn, that contrary to his own perception, the PCBs weren't dangerous at all. He asked some questions about the supposedly dangerous dioxins that are produced when the PCBs are heated to above 300 degrees Celsius, which were said to be frightfully poisonous. He writes, "I learned that dioxins, according to the judgement of all the actual experts consulted (and the very knowledgeable Academy of Science), are not at all 'frightful' and have never, anywhere, killed anyone."*(Foreword to The Holes in the Ozone Hole Scare - 21st Century Science Associates, Washington, DC. 1992 ISBN 0-9628134-0-0)
He surmised that the PCB ban was imposed for financial reasons, as the patents on the extraordinary PCB molecule was about to run out, so that a new patented substitute could be introduced as a replacement with instant sales in the order of billions of dollars. This assessment may be partially correct. The historical chain of destruction that begins with the PCB ban, however, suggests that a much more deeply seated reason was evidently the real force behind the ban.
Once the PCBs were history, the war on the DDT and CFC chemicals began. It should be noted that the environmental ideology still brings the PCB topic up from time to time, demanding gargantuan cleanup measures, in order to maintain this foundational ideological bubble. It must also be noted that the eradications of the PCBs has had a minimal effect in real terms. It prevented no deaths, nor has the ban caused any deaths. The project has costed only money, although huge amounts of it, but the ban has destroyed no human lives.
Now, with this initial victory secured, the relative innocence of the ideological war ended. The war on the PCBs served as a foundation for the next steps that in due course caused the death of millions of people.
Next Page
|| - page index -
|| - chapter index -
|| - Exit -
||
|
