|
Shouldn't Canada support all people who want to upgrade their status of living? How about large scale water development projects for flood control, like the Columbia River project? How about nuclear power development - the Modular High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor, and the new Japanese small scale Fast Breeder Reactor, are both ideally suited to upgrade the energy supply of the poorer nations, in order that the forests won't need to be cut down anymore for fire-wood?
5. Should Canada help nations to establish democratic governments? Hey, we don't even know how to generate sufficient political awareness in this nation, to keep the nation together in one piece under democratic rule. Canada should focus its efforts at supporting the institution of the nation-state, which is under attack globally, even through the U.N.. If these attacks succeed, as they are currently planned, Canada will be splintered into several mini-states or eco-territories, which offer little hope for this people to maintain the needed economic development that a growing population requires.
Part 2.
1. The questionnaire lists 12 points to prioritize, but these didn't include any of the weight issues on which peace depends, like international economic development; security for the nation-state; individual's right for life; freedom from want. Apparently, the welfare of mankind is not on the agenda.
2. About Canada's role in the U.N.; how has been? It's been atrocious! We have been servants to a sinister agenda, rather than contributors to the advancement of civilization.
3. Should children be educated about the U.N.? Absolutely! They simply have no idea what a great danger to their very lives the U.N. represents, especially considering its ambitious population reduction ideology.
4. Does the U.N. offer the best alternatives to resolve global conflict? Has the U.N. ever resolved any global conflict, anywhere? No! Its role in Bosnia has been to prolong the conflict; in Rwanda, to protect genocide; in Dessert Storm to, protect the rich and mighty while bombing the nation back into the stone age - with the economic triage still going on. Have its sanctions forced South Africa into sanity? No! This victory was won by the South-African people, and by the conscience of mankind, and not by the force of sanctions.
5. Should the U.N. have a standing army, as its general secretary wants? By God, no! Boutros Boutros-Ghali has been called Hitler by the people in Bosnia, and been demanded by their government to stand trial for war-crimes against humanity. It is bad enough to have a Hitler on the teem, without giving him a standing army. The next thing he want's are nuclear bombs. Bertrand Russell would tell him that.
6. What was the greatest success of the U.N. to date? None - if that question implies success in supporting the nations of humanity - otherwise, its greatest success has been in abetting the destruction of civilization by its efforts at destroying the nation-state, elevating tribalism, and instigating violence against the state. Strangely, the U.N. does not concern itself with countering terrorism, dope trafficking, money laundering, the scourge of financial derivatives gambling, and financial feudalism that forces a nation to pay 'rent' on its own 'estate,' its currency - like the peasants had to pay rent in feudal times, to their lords. Whom does the U.N. really protect? Whom does its IMF serve? Apparently, the people of the nations are not on this list.
7. What is the U.N.'s greatest failure? The greatest failure about the U.N. has been is creation as a world domination structure with elitist "Global Governance" goals. What happened to democracy? What happened to government by the consent of the governed? What happened to Franklin Delanor Roosevelt's "Four Freedoms" which were to be incorporated in the U.N. charter, but were scuttled the moment the President was in his grave?
Next Page
|| - page index -
|| - chapter index -
|| - Exit -
||
|
