|
Apart from these four levels of authority, no other authority exists that is founded on fundamental principles associated with the development of life. The authority of elitist dictatorship, for instance, is a self-assumed authority that is not founded in the supporting structure of unfolding infinity. It is manifest in control of one over another, based on personal will, breeding political apathy, closing the door to discovery and enquiry, and is often intentionally injurious and is ultimately always destructive, even deadly.
Understanding the delineation of authority, and the authority this delineation bestows on the individual citizen of a society to demand its government to transact the fundamental principle of social and physical development, gives power to a democracy. It gives authority to the politically alert citizen to ask a candidate for parliament, president, congress, or senate: Are you committed to carry out your mandate to transact natural principles, thus to shut down the U.N., the I.M.F., which are fundamentally dictatorial structures; to shut down information media monopolies; to shut down the current world-dominating financial system that has drowned mankind in debt; to end the ban of DDT that is killing vast numbers of people, and the ban of CFC that is destined to do kill even more; to build structures of national sovereignty in finance and trade for the economic development of the nation and the protection of its industries; etc.?
What hinders a nation to remove its support for the U.N., for instance, whose policies have been destructive on mankind? The democratic process does work, and it does give a people power to control their destiny if the people becomes alert enough about the forces that shape their experiences, their identity, and their future.
What would be the reaction of government if the following response to the Citizens' Panel Survey of the United Nations Association in Canada, were received by the millions; if people wouldn't just mark a box and rubber-stamp policies which some elite has determined is good for the people? Imagine if people were to take the time and analyze the issues, and care enough about their world, and their image as human beings, to direct their governments on these weighty matters with a written statement as these issues are too important to be simply brushed off with putting a mark in a box. Would there not be action forthcoming that accords with the responsibility taken?
The following reply to a survey is given as an example. The actual survey had been divided into two parts.
Part 1.
1. Should Canada continue to participate in U.N. peacekeeping? One really shouldn't call it that. The U.N.'s top level strategic policy in Bosnia has been to prolong the war and to aid genocide, but not to establish peace. How can an organization that seriously wants peace, prevent a people from defending themselves against an aggressor by imposing a weapons embargo against one side without disarming the other? Is self-defense no longer a basic human right? The U.N.'s actions violate all reason, unless, it wants the genocide, and wants the war to grind down slowly with the maximum amount of killing. And in Rwanda, how did the U.N. act? It came, but to observe? Who comes to merely observe a genocide, who stands idly by, is guilty, too, of genocide. It is a sad thing that Canada aids this war against humanity.
2. Should Canada support the Global Warming and Ozone Depletion response? - The question should rather be asked, why the U.N. is trying to murder humanity. There has been no global warming observed over and above the long term irregular variations, while the U.N. wants to shut down the use of fossil fuels that provide 95% of the global energy production on which mankind's existence depends. The U.N.'s environmental lobby also wants to shut down nuclear power. In other words, saving the environment isn't the point. What the U.N. is asking for, is permission to commit murder on a huge scale, by taking away mankind's foundation for existence. Hitler, the monster, demanded infinitely less. And besides all this, though CO2 levels are slightly up, the world temperature has not gone up one bit. The U.N.'s obvious aim is murder. Global warming is merely the cover for it.
Next Page
|| - page index -
|| - chapter index -
|| - Exit -
||
|
