|
Against the background of such gross abuses of the public's environmental sensitivity, such as committing vast scale destruction under the guise of environmental protection, puts the absurdity of the whole conservation game into perspective. It illustrates that the environmental destruction that is charged against human development, is not fundamentally caused by the advance of civilization, but is rather caused by oligarchic networks which often reap significant profits from senseless operations of destruction.
These irrational oligarchic interventions cannot be used as a standard to measure the natural interrelationship between man and the lower species. We must look beyond the oligarchy's interventions and judge the difference between man and animal in terms of the positive growth system that characterizes human development, that the human intellect has enabled, in comparison to the negative growth system that limits the growth potential of animal species by their dependence on the limits of the 'dust of the earth.'
This fundamental distinction between man and animal defies all theories of approximation that would blur the issue. The attempt to close the gap by successive approximation never represents truth. It is of vital importance today that this fundamental distinction be understood, in order to enact intelligently based policies in the political realm for protecting mankind against the murderous onslaught of oligarchic ideologies which are put forward dishonestly as a means of conducting a hidden warfare against human society for the maintenance of the oligarchy's advantageous differential of power by which it exists, which is threatened by mankind's development. In order to achieve the collapse of mankind's development potential, the environmental card is played in such a manner as to erase the distinctions between man and animal and manipulate mankind to voluntarily abandon its positive growth system on which human civilization rests.
An unfolding war on the truth.
The political significance of the above defined subtle manipulation of consciousness is best explored by looking at the catastrophic effect that is experienced when the fundamental uniqueness of man, as it is founded in spiritual truth, is ignored, and truth is suggested to be understood through processes of approximation, which is in this case is intended to pollute mankind's self-recognition with animal characteristics. For example, let us explore the "Endangered Species" legislation that is being proposed around the world. On the surface the project appears benign. The advertised aim is to help birds, plants, and animals, which are in danger of becoming extinct, to survive, by severely cutting back on human development processes that are said threaten their survival.
This pursuit appears logical, but it has disastrous consequences, because it ignores a fundamental distinction, namely, that man is not an animal. The proposed pursuit would be totally logical as a control project to regulate the animal kingdom. But man is not an animal whose impact must be reduced through cutting back or by annihilating his activity or presence. The human intellect is the foundation of a positive growth system fully capable of resolving environmental impact concerns through scientific development - which is something that no other species on the planet is capable of. The so-called natural world operates along the lines of a negative growth system as it depends on static resources and lacks the power to create new resources by means of intelligence. This fundamental difference can never be reconciled, nor should be reconciled, because it is the very recognition of this difference that provides protection for the lower species. Unless man recognizes his role and potential, the whole development structure that protects the lower species, is doomed.
This understood difference must reflect itself in differences in man's approach to problem solving. Modern game management techniques have in many instances helped animal species to survive when environmental variances would normally be fatal. What causes the extinction of species, is not the advance of man, but the moral and economic underdevelopment that is forced upon man under oligarchic pressures so that the natural strength of the human being cannot assert itself.
Next Page
|| - page index -
|| - chapter index -
|| - Exit -
||
|
