What is kept well out of sight by the "Heart of Darkness", however, is the simple fact that the mandated 80-85% reduction in global energy use will collapse all of the world's economic systems by which food is produced, housing created, large scale transportation becomes possible, etc.  Take that away, and you take away the physical platform that enables five and half billion people to exist on this planet.  Without the large scale use of energy, farms cannot operate, fertilizers cannot be produced, crops cannot be protected, harvests cannot be brought in, the commodities cannot be transported and turned into food products, nor could the products be distributed and finally be prepared for human consumption.  In other words 80% to 95% of the people of the world will be deprived of the means to sustain their existence if the goal is to reached that the Global Warming mythology mandates.  The goal, of course, is intended to be reached only in small steps.  It has to be that way, so that no one complains until humanity dies out in a whimper.

If one considers the immense scope of this goal, one can no longer be surprised at the disdain with which the human slaughter is currently carried out in Africa, that has reduced the population of Rwanda to almost half its size in less than three years.  The slaughter of a few million is evidently deemed minuscule compared to the larger focus of the "Heart of Darkness."  Indeed, humanity, itself, responds to the current slaughter with an unbelievable disdain, in the form of a glaring lack of interest in its self-defense.  As for Global Warming, humanity praises this mythology that is designed to bring about its destruction.  The "Heart of Darkness" is on the fast track of having its way.  The Global Warming mythology is as much hailed today as the nations of Europe had hailed the devil of nationalism that had set them at each other's throat in preparation for World War I.

But there is some light at the end of the tunnel.  A few sane patriots in the scientific world do daringly point out that there is no global warming happening.  They point to long term, actual, physical, measurements of global ocean temperatures, which are the same at this age as they were in the early 1800s prior to the industrial revolution.  They also point out, often at the expense of their careers, that mankind's addition to the earth's CO2 budget amounts to less than a 1% of what is produced naturally through the oceans, volcanos, and decaying vegetation.  They also point out, and this with good reason, and that an 80% reduction of this 1% portion to the earth's CO2 budget, makes no appreciable difference to its functioning whatsoever.  Some scientists even dare to point out that mankind has been mortally deceived when it has been induced by its scientific community to eradicate the very structures by which it lives.

Of course there will always be those who pipe the tune that pays the piper.  Today, those are many.  Nevertheless, humanity cannot escape the principles that govern the universe.  In accord with the astronomical cycles that affect the earth, the earth is inescapably in a transitional period towards a new ice age, which may have already begun.  Some honest observers point out that of a 120 foot tall radio antenna, that had been constructed in earlier years at McMurdo Sound in Antarctica, no more than the top 15 feet still protrude above the ice.  The rest is buried.

Actually, the opposition from the real scientific community to the policies based on the greenhouse warming doctrine is quite significant.  In 1992, over 4000 scientists and intellectuals from 69 countries, including 63 Nobel Laureates, signed an appeal against the doctrine that was put forward at the ecological conference at Rio.  The same happened again before the 1997 Kyoto conference convened, at which the fossil fuel reduction targets were imposed.  At this time 110 climate specialists had signed a declaration of protest against the unscientific predictions and demands.  Later, by May 1st, 1998, a total of 17,000 signatures were collected on a protest petition, signed by scientists from around the world, most of them with advanced degrees.  The signatories urged the US government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, as there was no evidence in support of its destructive premise.  One of the most outspoken opponents of the Global Warming myth is Dr. Ellsaesser, an atmospheric scientist who retired from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory after 23 years of atmospheric and climate research, who also spent 20 years as an Air Weather Officer for the U.S. Air Force.  He recognized in 1980 that the climate models incorrectly represented certain atmospheric processes.  Since then, more than 30 organizations and an increasing number of scientists have begun to speak out against the false global warming predictions, and the draconian demands that are build around them.*(See The New Federalist, page 9, Feb. 1, 1999.)

Next Page

|| - page index - || - chapter index - || - Exit - ||

Stories about  Sex from novels by Rolf A. F. Witzsche