|
This type of conspiratorial game is successful, because it shifts the focal point away from the real issues, which can thereby be more easily manipulated. The Emperors of Rome achieved the same affect with the great circus that absorbed everyone's attention.
Today's games of subversion have the same characteristics, and the same ideological driver that characterized Mazzini's operations. Only in today's situation, the oligarchy who drives the game, owns much of the communications media in the world. It also owns the elite scientific and environmental institutions which give the game the needed credibility. If Adolf Hitler were still alive, he might take the oligarchy to court for patent violations. The political monopolization of the media was his invention. It was pioneered for his cause.
Hitler's able propaganda chief Herman Goebbels had used this tool to elevate the public relations game to a near science. Later on, Hitler expanded the project. Whatever element did not exist in sufficient quantity to dominate every thought, was created, such as Germany's massive radio broadcasting system that was interfaced with cheap mass-produced radio receivers. Hitler owned the minds of the nation to a very large extend, just as the Empire does today.
Today's oligarchic game is played by far more advanced professional methods than those of Dr. Goebbels, involving not only the standard communications media such as the press and television, but it involves also such large elite institutions as the United Nations, which is one of the spear-head forces in the population reduction game under the rubric of "Global Governance."
Here we come upon still another point for the scientist of society to explore.
The U.N. as an evil organization.
01
.7. The scientist of society must explore how it was possible to create a united world organization for spearheading the self-destruction of humanity, and what can be done about it in order to prevent the realization of its goal.
81
The architecture of such an organization, of course, was not a new one at the time the U.N. was founded. The theme of setting up a totalitarian world government has many authors and is threaded through many a science fiction novel, but few of those fiction writers had the power and influence of the oligarchy's own Bertrand Russell. He became the chief policy advocate for establishing a totalitarian One-World government with sweeping enforcement powers based on the existence of a super-weapon, which the nuclear bomb became.
The entire last century of war was fundamentally an Anglo-Dutch oligarchic policy creation, including the policy drive for the creation and deployment of the atom-bomb as was idealized under the leadership of Lord Bertrand Russell, although its construction was carried out by the United States of America. Bertrand Russell and his forebears have had a long record as servants of the British royal family and its zeal to crush any nation-state standing in the way of the Empire, even the very concept of the nation-state.
These are strong words. But, what are the facts?
Bertrand Russell revealed his hand in the royal game, in a 1946 article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, in which he advocated the creation of a totalitarian world government, supposedly as a means for imposing peace by force. He writes, "When I speak of an international government, I mean one that really governs... An international government... must have the only atomic bombs, the only plant for producing them, the only air-force, the only battleships, and, generally, whatever is necessary to make it irresistible."
It is said, that while Russell was ostensibly devoted to peace, only a fool will overlook that, up until the Soviet Union demonstrated that it, too, had deployable atomic weapons, he proposed again and again that the United States and Britain level the U.S.S.R. in a repeat of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear bombing. From this background one journal concludes that "Bertrand Russell was arguably the most evil man of the 20th century... Russell's vision was to use atomic weapons to police a one-world dictatorship - which might run under the aegis of the United Nations, but which would in fact be the British Empire reconstructed."*(Executive Intelligence Review Oct.27/1995)
Next Page
|| - page index -
|| - chapter index -
|| - Exit -
||
|
